Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
I am writing to request information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 regarding dog theft within your force area. Please provide the following information:
1. Annual Totals: The total number of recorded crimes involving the theft or abduction of a dog for each of the last 5 calendar years (up to and including 2025)
2. Specific Offence Codes: If possible, please break these down by the Home Office offence code (e.g., how many were recorded under the new Pet Abduction Act 2024 vs. general theft/burglary)
3. Location Type: For each recorded crime, please provide the "location type" (e.g., dwelling/home, garden, public park, outside a shop, or from a vehicle)
4. Outcomes: The number of these cases that resulted in a charge or summons, a community resolution, or where no suspect was identified
5. Breeds: If held and within the cost limit, the top three dog breeds most frequently reported as stolen in the last year
1. Annual Totals: The total number of recorded crimes involving the theft or abduction of a dog for each of the last 5 calendar years (up to and including 2025)
Table 1.
|
Year |
Total |
|
2022 |
98 |
|
2023 |
72 |
|
2024 |
55 |
|
2025 |
66 |
|
Grand total |
291 |
2. Specific Offence Codes: If possible, please break these down by the Home Office offence code (e.g., how many were recorded under the new Pet Abduction Act 2024 vs. general theft/burglary)
Table 2.
|
HO Code |
HO Offence Title |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
Total |
|
008/65 |
Stalking involving fear of violence |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
008/66 |
Stalking involving serious alarm/distress |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
008/67 |
Engage in controlling/coercive behaviour in an intimate / family relationship. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
028/03 |
Burglary |
17 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
57 |
|
029/00 |
Aggravated burglary |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
030/02 |
Burglary |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
|
034/01 |
Robbery - personal/business |
10 |
8 |
5 |
5 |
28 |
|
035/00 |
Blackmail |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
|
039/00 |
Theft from the person of another |
2 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
|
040/00 |
Theft in a dwelling other than from automatic machine or meter |
7 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
24 |
|
045/10 |
Theft from a motor vehicle |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
046/00 |
Theft from shops and stalls |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
|
048/01 |
Theft of a motor vehicle |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
|
049/03 |
Abduction of pet dog/cat |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
|
049/10 |
Theft if not classified elsewhere |
48 |
30 |
28 |
32 |
138 |
|
059/11 |
Threats to destroy or damage property |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
061/25 |
Pass etc. counterfeit coin or note as genuine |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
105/01 |
Common assault and battery |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
130/01 |
Unauthorised taking of a motor vehicle (does not include ‘being carried knowing motor vehicle has been taken) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
195/12 |
Pursue a course of conduct in breach of S1 (1) which amounts to stalking |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
195/94 |
Harassment |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Grand total |
98 |
72 |
55 |
66 |
291 |
|
3. Location Type: For each recorded crime, please provide the "location type" (e.g., dwelling/home, garden, public park, outside a shop, or from a vehicle)
Table 3.
|
Location (if recorded) |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
Total |
|
Not Recorded |
91 |
65 |
43 |
48 |
247 |
|
Farm / Agricultural Building |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Flat/Apartment |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
11 |
|
Hotel / B&B / Guest house |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
House - Bungalow |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
House Detached |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
House- End Terrace |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
House- Mid Terrace |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
House- Semi Detached |
2 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
8 |
|
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Outside |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Parks/Gardens |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
|
Path |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Public House/Bar/Night Club |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Shop/Store/Supermarket |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
7 |
|
Street / Road |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Tram / Tram Station |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Grand total |
98 |
72 |
55 |
66 |
291 |
4. Outcomes: The number of these cases that resulted in a charge or summons, a community resolution, or where no suspect was identified
Table 4.
|
Outcome |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
Total |
|
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
Charge or Summons |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
Community Resolution |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Evidential Difficulties - Victim Based - Named suspect not identified |
11 |
9 |
6 |
6 |
32 |
|
Further action will be taken by another body |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Investigation Complete: No suspect identified |
48 |
25 |
18 |
23 |
114 |
|
Named Suspect identified: evidential difficulties prevent further action(no victim support) |
19 |
18 |
18 |
11 |
66 |
|
Named Suspect identified: evidential difficulties prevent further action(victim support) |
20 |
17 |
11 |
23 |
71 |
|
Grand total |
98 |
72 |
55 |
66 |
291 |
5. Breeds: If held and within the cost limit, the top three dog breeds most frequently reported as stolen in the last year
Note – As shown in the following table, breed is not a mandatory recording field on our crime system and therefore it is not possible to provide this information:
Table 5.
|
Breed (if recorded) |
2025 |
|
Blank / not recorded / not known |
64 |
|
Dachshund |
1 |
|
Dogue de Bordeaux |
1 |
|
Grand total |
66 |
Please note that this data should be interpreted with caution. Comparing numbers of incidents/crimes can be misleading and does not necessarily indicate the likelihood of someone being a victim of crime. In addition, the number of incidents/crimes recorded in an area over a period of time can be influenced by a number of factors. Consequently statistics on incidents/crimes for one period may not necessarily be a good indicator of future incidents in that area.
Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that this data has been extracted from a number of data sources used by forces for police purposes. The detail collected to respond specifically to your request may be subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when interpreting the data.
The figures provided therefore are our best interpretation of data which has relevance to your request, but you should be aware that the collation of figures for ad hoc requests may have limitations and this should be taken into account when those data are used.
If you decide to write an article / use the enclosed data we would ask you to take into consideration the factors highlighted in this document so as to not mislead members of the public or official bodies, or misrepresent the relevance of the whole or any part of this disclosed material.