Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
1. Number of "non-crime hate incidents" logged by the department/constabulary/force in relation to the platform Twitter/X, broken down by month, in 2024.
2. Number of "non-crime hate incidents" logged by the department/constabulary/force in relation to the platform Twitter/X, broken down by month, in 2023.
Following receipt of your request, searches were conducted for all non-crime hate incidents recorded during the specified periods that included the keywords 'Twitter', ‘Tweet’, 'X', or ‘@’ in the Incident Summary field. These results were then manually reviewed for relevance to your request. This review identified 14 non-crime hate incidents in total over the period that related to posts on the X/Twitter platform (see following table):
|
Month |
2023 |
2024 |
|
Jan |
- |
1 |
|
Feb |
1 |
- |
|
Mar |
- |
- |
|
Apr |
1 |
- |
|
May |
1 |
1 |
|
Jun |
- |
- |
|
Jul |
- |
1 |
|
Aug |
1 |
- |
|
Sep |
- |
- |
|
Oct |
2 |
4 |
|
Nov |
- |
1 |
|
Dec |
- |
|
|
Total |
6 |
8 |
Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that this data has been extracted from a number of data sources used by forces for police purposes. The detail collected to respond specifically to your request may be subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when interpreting the data.
The figures provided therefore are our best interpretation of data which has relevance to your request, but you should be aware that the collation of figures for ad hoc requests may have limitations and this should be taken into account when those data are used.
If you decide to write an article / use the enclosed data we would ask you to take into consideration the factors highlighted in this document so as to not mislead members of the public or official bodies, or misrepresent the relevance of the whole or any part of this disclosed material.